The company has too much debt already. It's certainly sad, true, but at least there a few laughs reading CEO John Foley's arguments (sorry, but Irish Times and sub. reqd.) why the Irish government should back Waterford with taxpayer money:
- They're only asking for a guarantee, not a loan or a grant (surely somebody out there would recognize that there's no risk in a guarantee and come to their aid. Surely. No?)
- They want to stay in Ireland (aren't they great)
- Government aid would be no different than public bail-outs of Northern Rock and Bear Stearns (yes, possible collapse of financial system or loss of luxury glass manufacturer - same thing)
- The company "has a heritage from the mid-18th century, has been manufacturing in the city for more than 60 years. It has been a good corporate citizen throughout this time". (Possibly my favorite)
- The company has been substantially supported by its shareholders in recent years (Duh. Maybe they should have realized earlier that the business was in trouble?)
- They believe it's desirable for Ireland to maintain Waterford Crystal in Ireland (I agree - each shareholder should pledge to double, triple his investment with zero expectation of any return)
- The "award-winning visitor centre", which attracts 350,000 people annually, could stay open. (I wonder if there are any other attractions that might be able to attract 350,000 people per year with €39m to spend?)